Thank you all for staying with me over this three-post tour of Circulation. Today I want to discuss Circulation as it is most commonly conceived and presented in the first-year writing classroom: as the activity of circulating a piece of writing amongst a particular audience and setting. In the process, I hope to explore the many questions that Circulating asks writers to consider as they compose their writing for a specific purpose and set of contexts.
Circulation as Rhetorical Context
Circulation as “Rhetorical Context,” as all of you undoubtedly have heard numerous times, is the practice of writing with a specific audience, genre, form, media, accessibility, impact, etc. in mind. For a library, this is maybe the organization of the materials in their collection, the layout of shelves and displays for patron navigation, and which materials are displayed. It also describes the impact this has on how patrons physically circulate through the library, which materials get circulated, and why—taking into consideration:
- Who the library’s patrons are,
- What they are interested in or need,
- Their access to those materials,
- The impact these materials have on their patrons as they circulate?
In the conference, we want to explore what questions we pose to students—and how we pose them—that can help them identify the affordances and constraints of different types or modes of Circulation. At the same time, we want these questions to promote students’ consideration of these pros and cons in connection with their own goals, enabling them to make purposeful rhetorical decisions with their writing. This may include:
- Who do they want to share their writing with?
- How does that audience conventionally circulate their writing?
- Do they want to adopt these principles or make the conscious, rhetorical decision to depart from certain genre conventions?
- What media and/or modalities are best suited to conveying and circulating their writing?
- How can a composition be effectively accessed and shared by the audience we want to reach?
- What tensions arise between voice and genre and how do we navigate them?
- How will it be received and is it expressing its ideas ethically and in good faith?
When we practice Circulation as a rhetorical context, we are asking students to think about why they are writing, then make informed decisions about how to best achieve these writing goals. And during the conference, we hope to address how to best go about fostering this reflective approach to composition.
Collaborative Circulation: A Recursive Roadmap
As these different contexts coalesce, it becomes apparent that Circulation is a recurring and collaborative writing practice. We hope that by foregrounding the practice of Circulation in the classroom, we can enable students to be mindful of all the questions Circulation asks them to consider in every phase of the writing process—harnessing Circulation for their own thinking and writing purposes.
I look forward to exploring the many ways Circulation takes place in the FYW classroom at the upcoming November 1st!